Are The Foam Rollers As Good As People Are Claiming Them To Be?

When looking at what is new or hot in the exercise world these days, you are going to run into foam rollers. Foam rolling or form rolling as some people refer to it, is certainly an intriguing concept. This piece of exercise equipment isn’t that large at all, and it is very inexpensive. Yet you can use it for many different exercises, and people are raving about its benefits and advantages.

If you look at what all this foam roller can do for you, you might just get you one for your at home exercise routine. It is convenient to have a small piece of exercise equipment at home that packs a punch. At the same time, you can certainly take it with you on the go, too. Do you travel for business a lot? Why spend time trying to find the hotel fitness center or working out there? You could work out in your room instead.

If you do want to spend time out and about while on business, go somewhere fun. Your workouts can be done quickly and easily using the foam roller, and you will enjoy being that organized. What type of a workout do you get using this piece of equipment? Well, it’s not just about a traditional workout, but also about rehabilitation. You will have to read up on how people are using these devices. So my recommendation is to buy foam roller now to make fit and fine your body also if you are not at home.

After doing so, look at the price tag. How can you pass up something that convenient and handy? I have said it many times before. I still haven’t purchased one myself. I am starting to think I should have listened to myself before. These pieces of equipment are getting more and more popular, so why not make this the day you give them a try. It could be your favorite piece of workout equipment.

An Travel Photographer’s Picturesque Bag

When traveling, the camera may be the one which you happen to have with you, however there are also situations in which you’ll want something more than the iPhone to capture high-quality photographs. Self-taught photographer along with Flickr consumer AJS Pimentel bags his travel camera team so he constantly has the gear to catch the perfect shot, while it is some down and dirty road photography or a landscape.

Read More

US Navy stole claims ship designer, Boat design

This hasn’t been a good season for the US Navy ships. Four boats from the Navy’s two classes of Littoral Combat Ship (LCS)–that the high-tech, modular warships that were assumed to be the future of naval warfare in areas near shore–have endured major engineering problems, including breaking down at sea. Three of the LCS ships that endured engineering failures were from the Freedom course, ships built by Lockheed Martin for the LCS application: USS Freedom, USS Fort Worth, and USS Milwaukee.   The application also has seen other setbacks, including the USS Montgomery (an Independence-course LCS built by Austal USA) suffering a cracked hull following hitting the wall using a Panama Canal lock.

However, the LCS’ engineering woes may not be the end of the trouble its shipbuilding programs are facing. As defense author David Axe reports, David Giles, a British aerospace engineer-turned-marine architect, has filed a lawsuit accusing the Navy of concealing elements of the Freedom‘s layout from job he did to commercialize a wave-piercing, “semi-planing” scale–operate Giles improved in the early 1990s.

Giles’ layout was originated from work his company. The patents had been filed for a layout to get high-speed container boats, known as Fastships. Giles formed a firm to build them. The layout patents died in 2010, but Giles’ firm–that is now bankrupt–filed suit against the Navy later years of trying compensation at 2012.

Lockheed Martin had formed a “strategic partnership” with Giles’ Fastships at 2002 since the Navy began looking at LCS layouts, Giles informed Axe. And he contended that design advice from his Fastships layouts–for container boats capable of speeds between 40 and 50 knots (46 to 57 mph)–was shared with confidence with the US Navy prior to that.

The Navy passed on Giles’ Prelude hull layout since it needed something bigger and quicker. The Navy then changed its head in 2003, altering the design requirements to the size and rate category coated by Giles’ patents. Lockheed kicked the project and Fastships apart but went ahead and incorporated much of Fastships’ design elements in the Freedom course hull, Giles has asserted. Lockheed was not named in the lawsuit.

This is not the only lawsuit the Navy faces over accusations of stealing property. Bitmanagement Software filed a federal lawsuit earlier this season accusing the Navy of all pirating that the corporation’s applications, installing more than 558,000 unlicensed copies of its own BS Contract Geo geospatial visualization applications when the service only had licenses for 38 computers. In that episode, the Navy has responded that it received consent to conduct the copies across its own network.

Too hot to handle

Meanwhile, the Navy’s new destroyer is with its engineering woes. After being commissioned at Baltimore in October, the USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) began a journey to San Diego, its assigned home port, for final equipment matching.

The Zumwalt comes with an all-electric drive system with power given by gas turbines. The issue with the ship was from the heat exchanger that cools the gas turbines. A Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) spokesperson told Ars in an email today that advice on the cause of the collapse was not yet available.

But, many of the British Royal Navy’s new destroyers, the Form 45, endured crashes operating from the Persian Gulf that summer since the intercoolers because of their gas turbine engines failed at the Gulf’s warm waters. The Type 45s All are receiving technologies overhauls to correct the issue. The system had design changes that are late and was not completely tested before deployment. It is likely that the Zumwalt’s heat exchanger also failed because of the temperatures of their water .